The Dilemma of Modern Christianity

Here are my thoughts for the 2nd Sunday in Easter.  The Scriptures for today are Acts 4: 32 – 35, 1 John 1: 1 – 2: 2, and John 20: 19 – 31.  This is also a political piece but the times demand it.

A edited version of this piece appears in the Winter/Spring 2017 Issue of God & Nature as “The Dilemma of Modern Christianity”

I have edited this piece since it was first published to remove a dead link.

For as long as I can recall, I have considered myself a liberal. It may be that I came to this decision because my father and mother were very much conservative in thought and I was seeking the ultimate act of childhood rebellion.

But there were other factors involved as well. As I have noted many times before, I am a second-generation military brat and I moved around this country more times than I care to admit during the 1950’s and 1960’s. Those were times of change in this country and I could see the change, even if I was not old enough to realize what I was actually observing. But as I looked around at what was happening, I began to see conservatism as a desperate clinging to the past and the ways of old, of holding on to the status quo, and a violent resistance to new and what some would describe as radical ideas.

In 1963 we lived in Montgomery, Alabama. That spring, Colin Chapman and Jim Clark brought the Lotus-Ford car to the Indianapolis 500. Up until that year, the cars that raced in this event were front-engine monsters with Offenhauser engines; they were big and bulky race cars with, of course, no resemblance to the automobiles that we drive today (or even then). What I remember about the “Indy 500” that year was how every so-called expert predicted that the relatively speaking tiny Lotus race car (designed by Chapman and driven by Clark) would be humiliated by the traditional racers of Indianapolis. But, what few people realized was that Jim Clark was a fantastic driver (I think I had seen him on some of ABC television “Wide World of Sports” events) and that his driving skills were on par, or even greater than, most of the drivers that raced in this race.

Were it not for some problems in the pits that year and a misunderstanding of the rules of the race, Clark would have won the race (he finished 2nd in a very close race; he ultimately would win the race in 1965). But I was fascinated by the change in design and how the tradition bound US auto racing establishment wrote off the cars before even seeing what they could do. As two websites ( and point out, racing in America was technologically stagnant and woefully behind the times. And while American racing began to change following the 1965 Lotus victory and the cars that race at Indianapolis are linear descendants of those first Lotus-Fords, I don’t think that we can say the same thing about the American automotive industry.

Earlier that same year, George Wallace was inaugurated as Governor and defiantly announced that segregation would be a part of Alabama life. Even though I am white, the rules of segregation affected me (perhaps not as much as it did black students) and I began to question the rules of society. We would move from Alabama to Colorado that summer but would be back in the south, living in Tennessee in 1966 but the rules of society had not much changed. I have written before about the nature of segregation and its affect on all the children of the south, so I will not spend much time on that point here.

And, as the Civil Rights drama unfolded around me in Memphis and the shadow of the Viet Nam War passed over my life, I continued to see conservatives speak with the same tired rhetoric and an adherence to the status quo while liberals sought change and equality. While the town where I was an undergraduate was very much a conservative rural part of Missouri, the campus ministers were very much in the forefront of bringing change to the area. It was the campus ministers who gave me hope that there was possibility in life and it further brought about my thoughts about what liberals and conservatives were and should be.

And while I am beginning to question what many liberals are doing in today’s world, I still see conservatives as opposed to anything that disturbs the status quo or suggestive of new ideas. I still see conservatives as longing for the old days, no matter if they were good or bad.

It has been long noted that if you presented someone with a copy of the Declaration of Independence without references to 1776 or King George and asked them to sign it, they probably wouldn’t do so. What would happen if we were to present the first reading for this Sunday (Acts 4: 32 – 35) without any Biblical reference to the people and ask them what they thought it meant.

The whole congregation of believers was united as one—one heart, one mind! They didn’t even claim ownership of their own possessions. No one said, “That’s mine; you can’t have it.” They shared everything. The apostles gave powerful witness to the resurrection of the Master Jesus, and grace was on all of them.

And so it turned out that not a person among them was needy. Those who owned fields or houses sold them and brought the price of the sale to the apostles and made an offering of it. The apostles then distributed it according to each person’s need.

Without a doubt, I think it would strike the reader, especially conservatives, as “socialism” and not a very good idea.

It strikes me that one of the problems with the modern church, and Christianity in this country, is that we have forgotten what the early church did and endured. We confuse the corporate church of today with the real church and the message that it once presented, a message that threatened the very structure of society, not because it was dangerous but because it was radical and went against the status quo.

For many people, the image of the church is one of “old” people who still sing the same hymns from fifty years ago and are aghast at the idea of “modern” music in a worship service and who still use the same format for worship that was used when they were young. The church itself is seen as the monolithic corporate body that found Galileo guilty of heresy and refused to admit that perhaps the Sun, not the Earth, is the center of the Solar System. We see it in the battles to force teaching of “intelligent design” as a viable theory of science in the biology classroom today.

For me, the battles that conservatives fight (be they political or religious) are battles of control, of saying that “I know what’s best for you when it comes to thinking and I am going to tell you what to say and think”. There are those who will tell me that the liberals of today will say that as well and they may be right. But conservatives make it sound as if the world will come to an end if liberal thoughts are allowed to pervade this world or if innovative ideas are allowed to develop.

Now, I am not going to let liberals off the hook that easily either; when you dismiss the beliefs of Christians, even if their beliefs are a little off, then you are as close-minded as those you dismiss.

Keep in mind that during the period that we have come to call the Dark Ages that it was the church that was the repository of knowledge and the keeper of the books that lead to the Renaissance. I find it very disturbing that many liberals dismiss Christianity (and other religions) as superstition. I find it disturbing that many publicly proclaim that there is no God and those who believe in God are fools. It reinforces the idea that they are just as set in their own ways as those they seek to ridicule and dismiss. And while I will accept their desire to not believe in God, I must ask what it is that they do believe in. For you cannot have a life in which everything is empirical and there is no belief. There may be those who have removed emotion from their lives and live only according to pure logic, but it is a life devoid of laughter and crying, of joy and wonder.

And to the point of today’s Scriptures, I find it confusing that someone can call themselves both a Christian and a conservative. No doubt, it is possible that one can be both but when there are people in need and your words speak against helping, for any reason, when you speak of war when Jesus spoke of peace or when you put the blame for a person’s poverty on the person instead of the system, it is hard for me to see you as a Christian.

When Jesus started His mission, He announced that He had come to bring health to the sick and relief to the oppressed. Jesus was a radical from the very beginning of his ministry and I don’t see how you can be a conservative and accept that idea. To bring health to a nation where there was no healthcare, to offer homes to the homeless, and to bring relief are very much liberal ideas in a world where it is everyone for themselves and what I have is mind and no one else’s.

I will be honest and say that when I hear someone tell me that the Gospel message is to make disciples of all mankind I cringe. I do so because they often say it in terms of finality. And the history of civilization is marked by those who felt that if you did not accept this Gospel message willingly, then you would accept it by force. Yet, Jesus never forced anyone to follow Him; the Twelve followed at His invitation and those who saw and heard the words followed but not by force.

As is the case in so many instances, we have come to accept one translation as the true translation. But one translation of the words that Jesus spoke (and I am borrowing from Clarence Jordan, another Southern Rebel in the liberal sense) is that we are to show the world what it is that Jesus did and can do.

The Gospel reading for today speaks of those who believe in Christ, not because they had seen the Risen Christ but because of what others had done and said. John repeats essentially the same message; it is what others see and hear that will lead them to Christ. Unfortunately, when you have a group whose words and actions run counter to the message of the Gospel, it is very difficult to bring them to Christ.

When I was in college I was involved in the Civil Rights movement on campus and the anti-war demonstrations (much to the chagrin and consternation of my parents). I did so because I believed that the causes were right and just. It was through my reading of the Scriptures and my own life that lead me to that view. But somewhere along the line, I came to think that it was those good works that were going to save me from sin and death. But it was pointed out to me by a liberal United Methodist pastor that I could not get into heaven by proclaiming to be a Christian yet not believing in Christ. It is by the Grace of God and our belief in Christ that we are saved, not by the good that we do. But in proclaiming that Christ is our Savior, we must work to bring about what He first proclaimed. Good works are not the admission ticket but the natural and expected thing of one who professes Christ as his personal Savior. Anyone can do good works but that alone is not sufficient to get one into Heaven if they also do not believe in Christ.

When the Baptizer began to prepare the way, he called for repentance; when Jesus began His ministry in the Galilee, He called for repentance. Repentance is not just saying one is sorry for what one has done in the past; repentance is the act of changing one’s life and beginning anew.

The people will see you proclaiming to be a Christian but if your life is still focused on the “rat race” and your concern is for yourself and not others, if you hold onto the status quo and deny others the same opportunities that you have, then it will be very difficult for them to see in you what is seen in Christ.

The problem right now is that there are truly no innovative ideas being developed and there are no creative solutions to the problems that this world faces. Everyone, be they liberal or conservative today, seems as stuck in their own old mindset and, just as the Indy cars of the late 1950’s and early 1960’s were quickly outclassed and outperformed by the new cars of the 1960’s, likely to go the way of dinosaurs. And unless better alternatives are offered, this society, this civilization will not continue the progress forward that it has made up until this point in time.

The alternatives will only come through Christ and a new life. I may be a voice in the wilderness but I hope this is a call for others to speak out against injustice and inequality, against the lack of healthcare and educational opportunities in this country, against war. 

I encourage you to do what Jesus told Thomas that day in the Upper Room so many years ago, show the people that Christ has risen so that they too will believe. Show the people by working for the same things that Christ worked for and be proud that you are a Christian and a liberal.

11 thoughts on “The Dilemma of Modern Christianity

  1. Pingback: Top posts for 2009 « Thoughts From The Heart On The Left

  2. What is important, is that we submit ourselves to the Lord. The bible was written by the apostles who had been given the Holy Spirit, and were thus guided in what they wrote. If you refuse to follow the word, then you CANNOT be a true Christian. Narrow is the path and straight is the way…..Too many times, people want to “elaborate” on the word through the use of the word “interpretation”. The last few verses of Revelation explain what happens to those who add to or take away from the word. Let yourself NOT be decieved. Satan, who roams like a hugnry lion, waiting to devour those in his path, uses all kinds of various methods to pull people away from the law. Ideas such as there are several ways to heaven, and women are allowed to serve as leaders in the church, and when scripture is used to refute their claim, they fall back on “interpretation” yet again. Pride and arrogance come from the evil one. Interpretation, used to “clarify” what God REALLY meant is clearly disobiedient and in fact tinges of blasphemy. Who are we to “correct” the Father? You must come to Jesus as a child…as a servant. Trying to come to him through the use of your “intellect” will give you only regret and shame as you answer for it on the day of judgement…and it IS coming. You MUST become a servant and obeyt he law as best you can. To do otherwise is to “hear but never understand”…and to listen with “uncircumsized hearts”. It is NOT easy. It is NOT popular. It is NOT vogue. But, the things of this world will surely pass….but the obiedient one, who is born again, and follows Christ will live on.

  3. I know that I am probably inviting trouble for responding but Joseph, are you supporting what I wrote or disagreeing with me? Based on what you wrote I would suspect that you disagree with me.

    Are you telling me that the way I have come to discern Christ in my life is wrong and that there is only one way to discern His presence? I know that Christ is my Savior. To be told that the manner in which I came to know that faith is false is arrogance on your part, not mine. I am going to go with what my heart and my mind tell me; I don’t think I am being arrogant or prideful when I say that.

    As I have written in the piece and so many others on my blog, when you present a fixed, legalistic framework that offers no hope and no promise, people will not listen. What so many in the church are offering today is the world of the Old Testament, the world before Christ. AND THE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT IT! We need to offer the words, the thoughts, the hopes that were given in the Gospel message. If we offer them the message, if we show them the message, if we prove to them that the message works and they still don’t believe or don’t want to believe, then they must face the consequences.

  4. Pingback: Top Posts of 2010 « Thoughts From The Heart On The Left

  5. I started enjoying your ideas and thoughts, and while i agree with your observations, your conclusions are heaped steaming b.s. which leave such a sore taste in my mouth i cannot help but wonder if you are familiar with the god written of in the bible at all.

    You make jabs at people who advocate war over peace claiming christ came in peace. Yet in matthew 10 he clearly states “DO NOT suppose i have come to bring peace.” And this is only the most clear of the many misguided statements you make about who and what god and christ are. As a member of the civil rights movement I sincerely hope you recognize that simply because it may seem innovative ideas and thoughts do not exist in the modern church, it does not mean they are non existant, it may very well simply mean that the culture of the modern church has placed such a kibosh on them they are unheard by the vast majority.

    These “ideas” are not made clear by words or inaction, but like your indy cars, by proving the modern interpretation wrong shamefully by being bold enough to compete. These interactions start by truly challenging the building (church) in the way we interact with it. This is a mentality which requires both the liberal, who may perceive how the church is no longer being gracious with its giftings and freely generous with its wealth, and the conservatives who recognize the ways that the church is purely being works oriented in thier giving, wherein thier generosity is even as noble a cause as standing for a civil rights movement, but merely a facade to avoid judgment.

    • Dale,
      First you will note that I edited your comment. There are some words that just don’t fit on this blog.

      Second, I found it interesting that it took you almost 18 months to respond to this piece. I am not sure where you are coming from with regards to the religious spectrum but I would think that challenging me with regards to what is in the Bible while not spelling God and Jesus correctly would say that you are somewhere on the non-religious side of things.

      Yes, Jesus did say that He did not come to bring peace but you might want to finish the thought behind the quote. Yes, he was bringing a sword but it was, at least as far as I have been able to determine, to wage war as we know it. For in verse 35, Jesus points out that He will set families against families. In fact, in the translation known as

        The Message

      the verse is translated as “make life cozy”. The challenge here is that Jesus sought to make us think outside the normal processes. This is something that many individuals, both in the church and outside, don’t realize.

      The other thing that perhaps confused me is that you somehow think that I am for a church that doesn’t innovate. I have read and reread what you wrote and I don’t think you are as a regular reader as you stated at the beginning. If you were a regular reader then you would know that I see the modern church as devoid of ideas and holding on to an outdated version of the Bible. Second, if your view of the Bible is of a vengeful God, perhaps you need to read it again, but not as a historical text but as a description of the human condition. It was for that reason that Jesus came to this world, sent by a Father who loved each one of us.

      Continue being a regular reader and perhaps you will come to understand from where I am coming and where I hope to go.

      May the blessings of this season be given to you and your family,
      In peace and with Christ,
      Dr. T

  6. Pingback: Top Posts of 2011 « Thoughts From The Heart On The Left

  7. The Bible is chalk full of contradictions theologist, who get taught how to think about God at places like RTS, make excuses for… I questioned Religion ever since I got past the sunday-school bible stories, and the more I defended it the more I found it twisted. Yeah it’s got some good advice and common sense, and stories about love. It has all that good stuff. Fundamentally it claims to put minds in the practice with fear and odd traditions to keep man from going insane and hurting his brother. This is ridiculous because there have been holy wars for centuries shedding blood and scientists persecuted for their noteworthy discoveries. BECAUSE a lot of folks didn’t read the whole book through and through, study it, and compare it to other beliefs. They didn’t realize “God” wasn’t too clear on some things. They were ignorant and/or manipulative and one of the many combinations of stupid. FEAR, it enslaves minds and makes people dumb like cattle or sheep. You end up with a Bernays type Scenario where you have people panicking that they wont experience total bliss and go to hell, topeth, Hades- however you want to sell and suffer. So what happens? You get insanity in all its mild and intense forms…

    There is a reason why Emperor Constantine, who murdered his actual son and countless others, was attracted to a cult belief that where a celestial father sacrifices his own son. He kinda digged it especially since the other religions rejected him and that Christians were desperate for some “No Persecution Time”. Lions aren’t friendly. Kind of ironic, lions killing and eating Sheeple. Anyway, Christians have a Roman Edited book that was modified at the Nicene Council. They basically took records of the old and what some consider the new testament and decided on which ones to burn and not burn. Why? Because eventually someone is going to read this stuff and ask questions. Jews were big into astrology, and astrology came from the Egyptians (look at the temples and pyramids MIND BLOWING!) and the Egyptians got astrology from the Sumerians- but that’s a different story. Moses was an adopted Egyptian. So where do you think he got his ideas? Astrology AND the Egyptian Library. Not many folks in Egypt liked Jews and hardly anyone liked him in the Egyptian Palace. It was the equivalent to blacks in America before and a little after the Emancipation Proclamation. What happens next? Mose’s God doesn’t like Egypt… And there you go, that is one and many of the reasons why I don’t BUY into Religion….

    Any organization that tells you to not seek knowledge and to not understand good and evil (Garden of Eden) is pulling the whool over your eyes. I’m not going to do a mock Vampiric Canabal Ceremony. If i want to do that I might as well go to the Bohemian Grove in Cali with Politicians and Cartel Leaders. It’s tough for Christians they have to defend the OT which is like the drunk father and go with the Hippie son NT. The Ridiculous thing about it is they are one in the same… Good people get fooled easily because they give the benefit of the doubt. They also get screwed easily because they forgive and FORGET. So they’re easy to con. There are fewer good people that are strong enough to not be taken advantage of than Sheeple. I GOTTA GET TO WORK NOW.

    • Well, I approved this comment if for no other reason than someone wants to take credit for writing it. What I found interesting is that is rambling and not very well edited. I wouldn’t even try to edit this (which I have the right to do) since I am not sure what the writer is attempting to say. But as I wandered through the murkiness, I figured that 1) the writer doesn’t care for organized religion and 2) the writer hasn’t read my stuff. If he had, he would know where I stand with relationship to the present state of organized religion.

      Let’s just hope that this writer gets his stuff together; he won’t get far if he doesn’t .

  8. Pingback: “Top Posts for 2012″ « Thoughts From The Heart On The Left

  9. Pingback: Top Posts of 2013 | Thoughts From The Heart On The Left

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.