The new issue of Clergy Project Newsletter is now available on-line. I urge you all to check this out as it has information related to the teaching of science and academic freedom.
The new WesleyNexus newsletter is now available here. Thanks to the people at WesleyNexus for the link!
This is an expanded version of what appears on the “Back Page” of the Fishkill UMC bulletin for 26 February 2017 (Transfiguration Sunday [A]).
One of the thing that I was thinking about was the song “I Saw the Light”. This is a country-gospel song that was written by Hank Williams (which I think most people didn’t know).
When I began teaching, I knew the subjects that I was teaching (chemistry and other physical sciences) and I was learning how to teach. But as this was all taking place, I found myself thinking about how my students learned chemistry.
We all learn in different ways and at different rates. And, as an instructor, I am tasked with helping each student reach that point of understanding; that point we call the “AHA! Moment”. It is that moment, and we all have had such moments in our own lives, when we understand what we are learning. This is a major moment in our lives because it takes us past simply “knowing” the right answer to understanding why it is the right answer.
I don’t think that it makes a difference whether we are speaking about secular or sectarian learning. And while I realize that this moment of understanding is different for each person, our educational process, both secular and sectarian, must be directed towards helping each person reach that moment of enlightenment.
And I realize that achieving this moment requires a great deal of effort, both by the teacher and by the student. How many times did we get the feeling that Jesus was frustrated by the lack of learning exhibited by the 12. They were his primary students and yet, time and time again, they didn’t seem to get the point of the lesson.
That is, until the First Easter and the Resurrection. Then they understood and when the Holy Spirit came to them on that First Pentecost, they became empowered to take the Gospel message into the world.
John Wesley knew what was needed but until that moment that we call Aldersgate, he didn’t quite understand how to achieve what he sought. The success of the Methodist Revival only began when the Holy Spirit warmed his heart and he understood who Christ truly was.
For Peter, James, and John, that moment was on the Mount with Jesus; for Paul, it was that moment on the road to Damascus.
Each of us has that same moment, that point when we understand that Christ is our Savior. Each person’s moment of understanding, of seeing the light is unique and we should never try to force our moment on others. But, we can and must help others find their moment.
Today marks the day that the Disciples began to see the light. Their lives began to change. Each of us has that moment; that moment when we realize that Jesus Christ is our personal Savior. And this gives us the opportunity to begin helping others find their moment.
Oh, I don’t know but this seems rather appropriate this morning. From the Gospel of John (as translated by Clarence Jordan), we read
“If y’all stick by what I’ve said, you are honest followers of mine. You’ll understand the truth, and the truth will liberate you.”
And from George Bernard Shaw, we read
“Some men see things as they are and ask why. Others dream things that never were and ask why not.”
This is the quote that President Kennedy referred to in his speech to the Irish Parliament in 1963 and was often used by his brother, Senator Robert Kennedy, during his 1968 Presidential campaign. Senator Kennedy also said in 1964,
To say that the future will be different from the present is, to scientists, hopelessly self-evident. I observe regretfully that in politics, however, it can be heresy. It can be denounced as radicalism, or branded as subversion. There are people in every time and every land who want to stop history in its tracks. They fear the future, mistrust the present, and invoke the security of a comfortable past which, in fact, never existed.
You cannot dream of things that never were, you cannot have a vision of the future, or even be free without education. And education must be more than the memorization and recall of facts but the active experience of learning, of seeking and of finding.
When do the languages of religion and science create commonality, and when do they create difference?
A couple of things about this piece – I am posting this on Boy Scout Sunday, which has a special meaning for me. This is also Evolution Weekend, the celebration of Charles Darwin’s birth (see Evolution Weekend for a list of my posts.) That this is the same weekend as Boy Scout Sunday is also of special significance for me.
Please note that this post will not be a debate on “nature versus nurture.” But if we are to have a vision for our future, we must first understand our past; I know it is a cliché but one must remember what the poet and philosopher George Santayana said, “Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it” (“Reason in Common Sense”, p. 284, volume 1 of The Life of Reason).
The other day I watching the last part of a show on Public Television dealing with genealogy and DNA. This, coupled with some other shows that I have watched on this topic and similar television stations, prompted the following thoughts.
First, if you have your DNA tested, you will be surprised by the results. Because, as it turns out, our DNA contains elements of the past that we would have never imagined. For example, many people with European backgrounds will be surprised to know that some 20% of their DNA is from Neanderthals (At least 20% of Neanderthal DNA Is in Humans). This research points out, that genetically, we are a diverse population. And this will be very disturbing for some people because the purest strands of DNA, the ones with the least number of sources come from Africa. As I said, some people will have problems processing that tidbit of information.
Now, if it were affordable, I would like to take advantage of that testing, if for no other reason than to prove or disprove some thoughts about my own heritage and ancestry.
When you look at my family tree, there are four branches. The most dominant one is probably the one that extends back to Germany in the 16th century. It would appear from the records that were discovered that constructed this branch that we, as a family, may have known Martin Luther personally for the records indicated that some twelve of my ancestors were or are Lutheran ministers. Perhaps it was this hidden genealogy that played a part in my choosing to be involved in lay ministry through the United Methodist Church.
But I came to this ministry through the Evangelical United Brethren Church instead of the Lutheran Church. And even though there is a shared German heritage in these denominations, there are those in the Lutheran Church who would view me as something of heretic for choosing a different path. But that, as you will see in the coming paragraphs, is perhaps one marker of my life today.
The other dominant, though shorter, branch on the family tree leads to the hills and hollows of Appalachia. I don’t know as much about this branch as I do the German branch but the signs on this second branch say that I am of the Scotch-Irish tradition.
The Scotch-Irish of America are among those whose families moved from Scotland to Ireland because English authorities encouraged Scottish families to move to Ireland, in part because of conditions in Scotland and in part because the English authorities wanted more of a presence in Ireland. Later, the English authorities decided that to be in a position of authority one had to be a member of the Anglican Church, which many of those Scots living in Ireland were not. From this began the move to America, a move to escape religious persecution where a government felt it had the right to tell others how and what to believe. And again, I can see in my past another strain of rebellion.
I would like to write more about the other two branches of this tree but those branches end rather abruptly, clothed in a seemingly impenetrable darkness. It may be with modern technology and perseverance along with society’s penchant for record keeping that this darkness can be removed and that my siblings and cousin will come to know more about what is for the moment, “familia incognito”.
And while there may be a genealogical basis for my rebellious streak, one can also become a rebel despite one’s genetics or family history just as easily. And in fact, it is probably easier to do it than one might think (see, for example, “I Am a Southern-born Evangelical Christian! What Are You?”
My choice to become a member of the Evangelical United Brethren church was not so that my ancestors could call me a heretic; rather, it was a choice of convenience since 1st Evangelical United Brethren Church of Aurora, Colorado (now the 1st United Methodist Church of Aurora) was the closest church to where I lived and it fit into the pattern of church attendance my family followed at that time.
My choice to enter lay ministry of the United Methodist Church was made before I knew of my family’s ministerial history. Perhaps the only part of my own past that directly influenced the path that I would walk was the decision in the summer of 1966 to become a chemistry major at Northeast Missouri State Teachers College (now Truman State University). (This, by the way, was also an unconscious act of rebellion because it did not fit the pattern that my father would have preferred; but that is for another time and place.)
The point must be made, and I feel that this is true for everyone, it is not necessarily one’s past that determines one’s future. The Greek philosopher Heraclitus wrote, “No man steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man.”
When you look at the river of time, you see a changing image; one that is not fixed in the past. But what you see can determine what you do.
I grew up at a time of great creativity. The Soviet Union’s 1957 launch of Sputnik spurred a demand for increased mathematics and science education. As I noted in “Liberal Arts and Science Education in the 21st Century”, there was development of curriculum materials that focused on experimentation, rather than the traditional method of rote memorization. It was a process that required the development of higher-level thinking skills.
Figure 1 – Categories in the cognitive domain (Bloom’s Taxonomy) – Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001
And alongside this change in how science and mathematics were being taught came a similar expansion of what I shall call the creativity aspect of social relations. No longer was there an acceptance of the traditional social status quo but a demand for an explanation of why people were treated equally in a world which proclaimed equality was the norm. (Or as George Orwell wrote in Animal Farm, “while all are equal, some are more equal than others.”)
I know that my questioning of Southern traditions began when I could see differences in the ways schools operated during the period from 1962 to 1966 when I moved from Alabama to Colorado to Missouri to Tennessee.
In 1968, Senator Robert Kennedy sought the Democratic Party’s nomination to be President of the United States. Throughout that campaign, he used variations on the following George Bernard Shaw quote,
“You see things; and you will say, “Why?” But I dream things that never were; and I say, “Why not?”
And in questioning some of those traditions, I began, in my own way, to ask “Why?” and “Why not?”
There are those today who would rather we not ask why but to simply take their word as the final authority on the matter, seemingly in both science and faith.
It should be noted that the opposition to Darwin’s theory of evolution is relatively modern. At best, it arose because religious authorities, having accepted the primacy of the Bible, could not accepted a reasoned and developed idea about how life evolved on this planet. But on at least one occasion in His ministry, Jesus told those around him to look at what they saw. If we are not to look around us at the world in which we live, how will we ever be able to make this a better place?
And while many will say that it was the Catholic Church that was opposed to Galileo’s depiction of the cosmos (based on what he had observed), it was the academic establishment who opposed his ideas, simply because they were counter to what they were teaching. This academic establishment pushed religious authorities to declare Galileo a heretic because that was the easiest way to get him out of the way.
It should also be noted that the notion of the “Big Bang”, confirmed by physical observations, was initially opposed by the scientific community because it was like the Creation story in Genesis.
If we are not teaching our children how to think and evaluate, how then can we even begin to envision the future? And I am fully aware that in doing so, we are encouraging our children to think independently and without our input. And this causes great concern for some because it brings into question what they have been teaching their children all these years.
My only response to this is that if you have been teaching your children through strict adherence to a set of guidelines and without explanation, you had better be willing to accept defiance and rebellion. And you had better begin questioning just what it is that you believe. Is your faith and belief system strong enough to withstand questioning?
My understanding of evolution and the “Big Bang” only enhances my belief in God, for when I see the wonders of His work, I can only begin to wonder how it all took place. And, as it is written in Genesis, I was created in God’s image, then I was created to be a questioning and inquisitive individual.
I look at my heritage with an understanding that is where I come from. But my heritage can never tell me where I am going. Nothing from our past or our present can give us any insight into what our future will hold. But it is what we do today that will allow there to be a future.
We must be working for a better understanding of the world around us, for a better understanding of the other people with whom we share this world, and for a better understanding of how we came to be on this planet.
The future will always be the last “great unknown” and getting there will not be easy but, with the tools and abilities that we have been given, it ought to be fun.
In 1962 and 1963, I lived in Montgomery, Alabama. It was a year of many firsts for me; I began playing the trumpet and I was introduced to or at least became aware of the role of football in Southern culture. It was the beginning of my awareness that equality in this country was perhaps nothing more than words. It was also when I began to think that God was calling me. When we moved during the summer of 1963 to Denver, I began to explore how I would answer that call. And thus I began working towards earning the God and Country award in Boy Scouts.
As I worked on this award, I was also in confirmation class and during the spring of 1965 I would earn the God and Country award and be confirmed in the Evangelical United Brethren Church. Thus I began my walk with the Lord. It has been a rough walk, done at times without acknowledging His presence in my life but perhaps more times than not knowing that His presence was a distinct part of my life.
There came a time around in 1984 when I began to think about that call and that I really hadn’t answered it completely. You have to realize that earning the God and Country award is more than simply answering some questions and do some exercises each week. It requires more than that, a commitment of heart and soul. And I needed to find a way to fulfill that commitment. So I made a covenant with God to be more active. In the churches where I was a member, I began to be a liturgist, specifically requesting that assignment on the 2nd Sunday in February, Boy Scout Sunday. And to the best of my ability, I have done so every year since then. Of course, from 1999 to 2005, on that Sunday, I was also the lay pastor of the church. And since 2005, if I was not somewhere in the district covering for a pastor, I have posted my thoughts on this blog.
The following is a summary of my sermons/messages/posts for the 2nd Sunday in February, Boy Scout Sunday.
February 14, 1999 – Neon (KY) UMC – “A Scout is Reverent”
February 13, 2000 – Walker Valley (NY) UMC – “Following Directions”
February 11, 2001 – Walker Valley (NY) UMC – “Two Roads”
February 10, 2002 – Walker Valley (NY) UMC – not on file
February 9, 2003 – Tompkins Corners (NY) UMC– “A Scout is Reverent”
February 8, 2004 – Tompkins Corners (NY) UMC – “A Scout is Reverent”
February 6, 2005 – Tompkins Corners (NY) UMC – “The Mountaintop Experience”
February 12, 2006 – “Seek The Truth”
February 11, 2007 – “A Brief Discourse”
February 10, 2008 – “What Have We Learned?”
February 8, 2009 – “The New Paradigm”
February 14, 2010 – “That Transforming Moment”
February 13, 2011 – “It’s about Commitment”
February 12, 2012 – “To Leave the World A Better Place”
February 3, 2013 – “Removing The Veil”
February 9, 2014 – Sloatsburg UMC – “The Master Lesson”
February 8, 2015 – did not post a blog for this Sunday
February 14, 2016 – “Where Are We Going?”
February 12, 2017 – “The Past Can Never Be Our Future”