Monthly Clergy Letter Project Newsletter

The new issue of Clergy Project Newsletter is now available on-line.

  1. Evolution Weekend 2020:  Help Needed;
  2. Astrobiology News for July 2019:  NASA’s Dragonfly to Explore Titan;
  3. Too Big a Flood for the Ark;
  4. The Frightening Nature of Christian Nationalism;
  5. The Intersection of Zen and Science:  Part Two; and
  6. How Erasmus Darwin’s Poetry Prophesied Evolutionary Theory.

The WesleyNexus Newsletter

The new WesleyNexus newsletter is now available.

In this issue:

Discovery & Faith Seeks Churches to Pilot Its New Curricula in Fall 2019

Dr. Gary Sherman Challenges the Status Quo on GMOs and Food Security at recent IRAS Conference

Celebrating the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Moon Landing & the Apollo Mission

Animal Suffering: God & Pain in the Evolutionary Story

How to Understand the Universe When You’re Stuck Inside of It by Amanda Gefter

Two Conference taking place even now.

Some thoughts on the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 landing

This will be on the “Back Page” of July 21, 2019 ( 6th Sunday after Pentecost, Year C) bulletin for Fishkill UMC. Service begins at 10:15 and you are always welcome!

Earthrise, December 24, 1968 – a reminder that we are the caretakers of this world – some additional thoughts can be found at “Christian author sees climate change as a moral issue.”

Footprint on the moon, July 20, 1969 – In your journey with Christ, where will you leave your mark?

“String Theory”

This will be the “Back Page” for the Fishkill UMC bulletin for this Sunday, July 14, 2019 – the 5th Sunday after Pentecost (Year C)

String theory is an advanced theory in physics that describes our universe and its beginnings.  It does so by envisioning a system of multiple dimensions, among which are the four dimensions of space and time in which we live.  While this theory attempts to describe our universe physically, how can we describe this universe spiritually?

When you look at the two towers of the Verazzano-Narrows Bridge, you can tell they are straight and they appear to be parallel.

However, that is only a two-dimensional view.  Because of the height of the towers (693 ft or 211 m) and their distance from each other (4,260 ft or 1,298 m), the curvature of the Earth’s surface had to be considered when designing the bridge. The towers are not parallel to each other but are 1 58 in (41.275 mm) farther apart at their tops than at their bases.  This line is that distance:      

Even with such a small distance, the designers had to see the world in three dimensions rather than two dimensions in order to build the bridge.

The religious and political authorities in Jesus’ time saw life in two dimensions.  There were clear lines of demarcation that told people who they were and what they can do.  Woe to anyone who dared to cross those lines.  But that is exactly what Jesus did; Jesus saw the world in three dimensions and routinely crossed the lines and challenged the definitions.

Even today, there are many who seek life in two dimensions.  Which makes living in this three-dimensional world that much harder.  And that is the same challenge gave Jesus gave the people two thousand years ago; how do we live in a three-dimensional world?         

~~Tony Mitchell

Faith and Reason

The following links go to a series dealing with faith and reason posted on the Emerging Scholars Blog (updated on 8 June 2019):

Faith and Reason, Part 1

Faith and Reason, Part 2: Augustine

Faith and Reason, Part 3: Aquinas

Faith and Reason, Part 4: Locke

Faith and Reason, Part 5: Hume

Faith and Reason Part 6: Plantinga

Faith and Reason Part 7: Plantinga, Continued

I am sharing this because reason is considered one part of the Wesleyan quadrilateral.  Your comments are welcome (please note that comments made here are not shared with the author of the posts so it would be wise to share you comments on the appropriate post.

Growing Suspect of Religion, not Science

I am reposting this from “The Catholic Astronomer” web site.  Take some time to read through the notes and observe the conclusions.

On the Vatican Observatory Faith and Science pages there is a really cool entry that readers of The Catholic Astronomer should take a look at.  The entry consists of an excerpt from the Tahāfut al-falāsifa, or The Incoherence of the Philosophers, of Abu Hāmid Muhammad Ibn Muhammad al-Tūsi al-Ghazālī.  (The excerpt is fully downloadable in PDF format.)  Al-Ghazālī, who lived in the eleventh century, is one of medieval Islam’s best-known religious intellectuals. Al-Ghazālī says that disputing matters of science on the basis of religious texts or ideology is a waste of time.  Moreover, he says the atheists love it when people of faith do such things, because, he says, “then the atheist’s path for refuting religion becomes easy”.  He says that once something is scientifically well-established (for example, the mechanism by which eclipses occur), then whoever inspects them and is convinced by their evidence, deriving for himself information about the extent, times of occurrence, and duration of these two kinds … Continue reading →

Source: Growing Suspect of Religion, not Science

Is It A Question or A Statement?

Here are my thoughts for this Sunday, February 24, 2019 (7th Sunday after the Epiphany, Year C). They will appear on the “Back Page” of the bulletin for Fishkill UMC.

A hallmark of many Annual Conferences is the singing of the Charles Wesley hymn, “Are We Yet Alive.”  In the past, this was sung to celebrate the completion of a year of service at a time when the lifespan of a circuit rider was notably short.

If we were to sing that today, would it be sung as a question or as a statement?

When I was working on my doctorate at Iowa, some of my colleagues were looking at what constituted a successful high school program.  Their conclusions were very similar to research about successful businesses.  Innovation is best when it started at the bottom and was supported by the top of the organization (adapted from “The Search for Excellence in the Church Today”),

Jesus did not go to the Temple and expect the people to come to Him.  Rather He went to the people.  He did not work within the structure of the Law, which prevents access; He used the Law as a framework for his mission.

Many churches are dying today because they are unwilling to step outside the structure of the church.  But the good news is that if, individually and collectively, the church welcomes the power of the Holy Spirit, they can find ways to become alive once again.

How, then, will we sing “And Are We Yet Alive”, as a question and sign of a dying and dead church, or a statement of a living and growing church?        ~~Tony Mitchell